PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAR vs. FSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DMAR vs. FSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DMAR vs. FSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
1.79%9.13%12.74%12.25%-5.48%7.04%
FSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
-2.39%12.83%13.56%20.23%-7.05%8.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than FSEP's -2.39% return.


DMAR

1D
1.41%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.79%
6M
4.00%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*

FSEP

1D
2.14%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMAR vs. FSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMAR and FSEP have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

DMAR vs. FSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEP
FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAR vs. FSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMARFSEPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.08

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

1.60

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.64

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.69

8.32

+5.37

DMAR vs. FSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the FSEP Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAR and FSEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMARFSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.08

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.80

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.96

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between DMAR and FSEP is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DMAR vs. FSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DMAR nor FSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DMAR vs. FSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, smaller than the maximum FSEP drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and FSEP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DMARFSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-13.79%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-8.16%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

-13.79%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-3.60%

+3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-2.19%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.60%

-0.67%

Volatility

DMAR vs. FSEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is 1.94%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that DMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DMARFSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

3.75%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

6.13%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.59%

12.12%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

10.75%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.05%

10.64%

-3.59%