PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAR vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAR vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than AAPR's 3.82% return.


DMAR

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.43%
YTD
7.21%
6M
8.16%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*

AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAR vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DMAR and AAPR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.85

The correlation between DMAR and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAR vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAR vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMARAAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.04

1.99

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.68

12.12

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.37

62.99

-0.62

DMAR vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAR Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is comparable to the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAR and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMARAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07

4.18

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.73

-0.57

Drawdowns

DMAR vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMARAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-5.99%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-0.81%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.15%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-0.45%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.16%

+0.08%

Volatility

DMAR vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) have volatilities of 0.67% and 0.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMARAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.68%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

1.57%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

2.36%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

4.81%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

4.81%

+2.16%

DMAR vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAR vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DMAR nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAR and AAPR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPR has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to DMAR (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAR dropped -9.84% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, DMAR leads with 14.75% vs 9.83% for AAPR. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMAR has performed better with a 14.75% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.

DMAR and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAR and 0.79% for AAPR.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 4.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAR and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer