PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMA vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DMA vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DMA vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
-5.96%16.89%41.06%-3.81%-15.90%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
0.36%8.12%5.52%5.29%-5.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMA achieves a -5.96% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return.


DMA

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-5.96%
6M
0.97%
1Y
8.74%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
10Y*

SICIX

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
0.36%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
3.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMA vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DMA vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMA
DMA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMA vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMASICIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

1.66

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

2.20

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.19

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.39

8.95

-6.55

DMA vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMA and SICIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMASICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.66

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.78

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between DMA and SICIX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DMA vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

DMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.69%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
13.69%9.42%3.83%5.22%10.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.86%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Drawdowns

DMA vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMA drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMA and SICIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DMASICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-27.62%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-2.73%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-2.39%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-3.59%

-7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

0.67%

+2.71%

Volatility

DMA vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that DMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DMASICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

1.24%

+3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

2.06%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

3.66%

+14.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.34%

3.87%

+20.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.34%

3.89%

+20.45%