DLY vs. BWG
DLY (DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund) and BWG (BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DLY returned 2.07%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for BWG. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLY charges 2.91%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for BWG.
Performance
DLY vs. BWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLY achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than BWG's -0.48% return.
DLY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BWG
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.11%
DLY vs. BWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | -0.38% | 0.63% | 16.29% | 25.48% | -23.08% | 8.56% | -3.06% |
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund | -0.48% | 17.38% | 7.31% | 15.94% | -21.53% | 1.34% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLY and BWG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLY vs. BWG — Risk / Return Rank
DLY
BWG
DLY vs. BWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLY | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.17 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.80 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 2.57 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLY | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 0.93 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.13 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.21 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DLY vs. BWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLY drawdown since its inception was -28.61%, smaller than the maximum BWG drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLY and BWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLY | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.61% | -35.39% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -12.03% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.81% | -14.00% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.61% | -34.10% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.48% | -4.60% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -10.86% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.75% | -0.35% |
Volatility
DLY vs. BWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) is 1.93%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that DLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLY | BWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 2.68% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.85% | 8.52% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.09% | 10.37% | -2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 14.10% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 15.01% | +0.04% |
DLY vs. BWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLY has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than BWG's 2.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLY vs. BWG - Dividend Comparison
DLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, less than BWG's 12.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund | 12.11% | 11.47% | 12.00% | 11.73% | 13.25% | 8.20% | 6.81% | 6.55% | 8.70% | 8.35% | 10.31% | 16.41% |
DLY DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund | 10.07% | 9.63% | 8.85% | 9.84% | 10.67% | 7.49% | 5.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLY and BWG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWG has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to DLY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLY dropped -28.61% vs BWG's -35.39%.
BWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLY and BWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer