PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLTM.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than MVOL.L's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DLTM.L has outperformed MVOL.L with an annualized return of 7.49%, while MVOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.05% annualized return.


DLTM.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-7.84%
YTD
9.93%
6M
8.15%
1Y
36.25%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
7.49%

MVOL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.44%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
9.93%54.43%-26.89%33.42%7.99%-9.75%-11.20%12.80%-5.26%21.02%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.67%11.02%11.08%7.28%-9.62%14.65%2.56%22.56%-2.40%17.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DLTM.L and MVOL.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012

0.47

The correlation between DLTM.L and MVOL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLTM.L
DLTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLTM.LMVOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.04

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

0.25

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

0.61

+7.84

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLTM.L and MVOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLTM.LMVOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.19

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.49

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.73

-0.68

Drawdowns

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLTM.L drawdown since its inception was -64.38%, which is greater than MVOL.L's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTM.L and MVOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLTM.LMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.38%

-28.82%

-35.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-5.78%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

-8.14%

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-18.52%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.87%

-28.82%

-26.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.31%

-3.86%

-8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-3.34%

-26.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

2.36%

+1.92%

Volatility

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) at 2.01%. This indicates that DLTM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLTM.LMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

2.01%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

5.58%

+11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

7.74%

+12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

10.64%

+12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.57%

11.65%

+14.92%

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLTM.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLTM.L vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

DLTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while MVOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
3.50%3.54%5.77%4.23%6.82%3.20%1.66%2.31%2.17%1.47%1.44%2.98%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLTM.L and MVOL.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVOL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVOL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DLTM.L.

DLTM.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while MVOL.L is Global Equities. DLTM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DLTM.L and 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLTM.L and MVOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer