PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DLTM.L is traded in USD, while FVUB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FVUB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLTM.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than FVUB.L's 14.30% return.


DLTM.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-7.84%
YTD
9.93%
6M
8.15%
1Y
36.25%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
7.49%

FVUB.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
14.30%
6M
9.95%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
9.93%54.43%-26.89%33.42%7.99%-9.75%-11.20%7.53%
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
14.30%45.73%-27.99%33.00%10.60%-16.21%-19.81%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DLTM.L and FVUB.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.91

The correlation between DLTM.L and FVUB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLTM.L
DLTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FVUB.L
FVUB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLTM.LFVUB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.39

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

7.19

+1.26

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLTM.L and FVUB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLTM.LFVUB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.49

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.22

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.02

+0.03

Drawdowns

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLTM.L drawdown since its inception was -64.38%, which is greater than FVUB.L's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTM.L and FVUB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLTM.LFVUB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.38%

-60.84%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-14.74%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

-28.75%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-32.05%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.31%

-14.74%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-26.92%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

4.90%

-0.62%

Volatility

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) is 6.11%, while Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that DLTM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVUB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLTM.LFVUB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

7.53%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

19.77%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

23.62%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

26.98%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.57%

32.83%

-6.26%

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLTM.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FVUB.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLTM.L vs. FVUB.L - Dividend Comparison

DLTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while FVUB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
3.50%3.54%5.77%4.23%6.82%3.20%1.66%2.31%2.17%1.47%1.44%2.98%
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLTM.L and FVUB.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DLTM.L.

DLTM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while FVUB.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DLTM.L and 0.19% for FVUB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLTM.L and FVUB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer