DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L
DLTM.L (iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF) and ASDV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - DLTM.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while ASDV.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DLTM.L returned 7.49%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for ASDV.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLTM.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ASDV.L.
Performance
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLTM.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than ASDV.L's 3.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DLTM.L has outperformed ASDV.L with an annualized return of 7.49%, while ASDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.
DLTM.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
ASDV.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLTM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF | 9.93% | 54.43% | -26.89% | 33.42% | 7.99% | -9.75% | -11.20% | 12.80% | -5.26% | 21.02% |
ASDV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 3.36% | 23.27% | 4.84% | 15.47% | -15.61% | 2.54% | 0.15% | 20.64% | -9.03% | 29.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLTM.L and ASDV.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between DLTM.L and ASDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
DLTM.L
ASDV.L
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLTM.L | ASDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 1.56 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 4.22 | +4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLTM.L | ASDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.04 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.28 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.44 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.42 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLTM.L drawdown since its inception was -64.38%, which is greater than ASDV.L's maximum drawdown of -35.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTM.L and ASDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLTM.L | ASDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.38% | -35.08% | -29.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -7.59% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -14.64% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -35.08% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.87% | -35.08% | -19.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.31% | -4.75% | -7.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -8.16% | -21.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 2.82% | +1.46% |
Volatility
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that DLTM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLTM.L | ASDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 3.59% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 9.09% | +8.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.22% | 11.41% | +8.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 14.76% | +8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.57% | 15.29% | +11.28% |
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLTM.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ASDV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLTM.L vs. ASDV.L - Dividend Comparison
DLTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than ASDV.L's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASDV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.11% | 2.89% | 3.63% | 2.98% | 2.82% | 2.65% | 2.52% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 3.24% |
DLTM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF | 3.50% | 3.54% | 5.77% | 4.23% | 6.82% | 3.20% | 1.66% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.47% | 1.44% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLTM.L and ASDV.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASDV.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASDV.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DLTM.L.
DLTM.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ASDV.L is Asia Pacific Equities. DLTM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while ASDV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DLTM.L and 0.55% for ASDV.L.
Find the right allocation for DLTM.L and ASDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer