PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLSNX vs. DLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DLSNX vs. DLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DLSNX vs. DLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N
0.00%5.49%5.06%6.50%-3.04%0.56%1.04%
DLY
DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund
-2.15%0.63%16.29%25.48%-23.08%8.56%-3.06%

Returns By Period


DLSNX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.99%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
2.58%

DLY

1D
-0.22%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-2.15%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DLSNX vs. DLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLSNX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than DLY's 2.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DLSNX vs. DLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLSNX
DLSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DLSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DLSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DLY
DLY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLSNX vs. DLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLSNXDLYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

-0.44

+3.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.68

-0.48

+5.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

0.92

+0.86

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

-0.51

+5.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.70

-1.39

+25.09

DLSNX vs. DLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLSNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the DLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLSNX and DLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLSNXDLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

-0.44

+3.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.99

0.18

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.17

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between DLSNX and DLY is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DLSNX vs. DLY - Dividend Comparison

DLSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than DLY's 10.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N
3.97%4.40%4.85%4.25%2.24%1.47%2.12%2.96%2.67%2.18%2.27%2.22%
DLY
DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund
10.08%9.63%8.85%9.84%10.67%7.49%5.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DLSNX vs. DLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLSNX drawdown since its inception was -86.56%, which is greater than DLY's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLSNX and DLY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSNXDLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.56%

-28.61%

-57.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.83%

-10.25%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.91%

-28.61%

+23.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.15%

-6.18%

-76.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.18%

-7.94%

-42.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

3.79%

-3.62%

Volatility

DLSNX vs. DLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) is 0.53%, while DoubleLine Yield Opportunities Fund (DLY) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that DLSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DLSNXDLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

5.13%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

6.47%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

12.22%

-10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.41%

13.53%

-12.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.30%

15.19%

+188.11%