PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 11.47% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 7.86%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.


DLS

1D
0.38%
1M
1.63%
6M
3.76%
YTD
8.83%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.45%

VV

1D
1.54%
1M
1.73%
6M
9.64%
YTD
11.47%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
15.17%
ALL TIME*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.55M$1.40M$1.52M
$82.71M$75.65M$91.95M

DLS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
8.83%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
11.47%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and VV is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.77

The correlation between DLS and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
VV

Industrials

28.0%
8.2%

Financial Services

13.8%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
9.0%

Technology

9.1%
39.1%

Basic Materials

9.0%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.4%

Real Estate

7.4%
1.6%

Communication Services

4.2%
9.7%

Healthcare

3.6%
8.9%

Energy

2.4%
3.0%

Utilities

2.0%
2.5%

Industrials

DLS
28.0%
VV
8.2%

Financial Services

DLS
13.8%
VV
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.9%
VV
9.0%

Technology

DLS
9.1%
VV
39.1%

Basic Materials

DLS
9.0%
VV
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.7%
VV
4.4%

Real Estate

DLS
7.4%
VV
1.6%

Communication Services

DLS
4.2%
VV
9.7%

Healthcare

DLS
3.6%
VV
8.9%

Energy

DLS
2.4%
VV
3.0%

Utilities

DLS
2.0%
VV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLSVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.49

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

10.49

-4.72

DLS vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than VV's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-54.81%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-9.21%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-18.97%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-25.66%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

-34.28%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.02%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-6.80%

-6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.18%

+1.08%

Volatility

DLS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 4.11% and 3.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

3.94%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

10.27%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

13.00%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

17.37%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

18.22%

-1.84%

DLS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VV's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.49%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.01%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLS and VV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLS has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to VV (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.17% vs 7.86% for DLS. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.01% for VV.

DLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer