DLS vs. NISM
DLS (WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund) and NISM (NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. DLS is passively managed, while NISM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DLS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NISM.
Performance
DLS vs. NISM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DLS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
NISM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.54M | $1.48M | $1.54M | |
| $2.13K | $1.70K | $7.87K |
DLS vs. NISM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund | -0.14% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | -0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLS and NISM is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLS vs. NISM — Risk / Return Rank
DLS
NISM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DLS vs. NISM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLS | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLS vs. NISM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than NISM's maximum drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and NISM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLS | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.13% | -4.35% | -58.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -0.68% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -1.80% | -11.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | — | — |
Volatility
DLS vs. NISM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLS | NISM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 14.26% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 14.26% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 14.26% | +2.12% |
DLS vs. NISM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than NISM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLS vs. NISM - Dividend Comparison
DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than NISM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.51% | 3.87% | 4.56% | 4.29% | 4.96% | 3.29% | 2.50% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 2.79% | 3.29% | 2.72% |
NISM NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLS and NISM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NISM.
DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.24% for NISM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.70% for NISM.
Find the right allocation for DLS and NISM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer