PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLQAX vs. DBMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DLQAX having a 7.42% return and DBMYX slightly lower at 7.20%. Over the past 10 years, DLQAX has outperformed DBMYX with an annualized return of 12.86%, while DBMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.


DLQAX

1D
0.98%
1M
1.40%
6M
6.08%
YTD
7.42%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
12.86%
ALL TIME*
5.00%

DBMYX

1D
-1.02%
1M
-6.33%
6M
-1.43%
YTD
7.20%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
11.34%
ALL TIME*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLQAX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund
7.42%14.27%21.29%16.81%-23.77%27.21%23.57%29.30%-6.06%24.54%
DBMYX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y
7.20%11.94%10.09%15.63%-33.11%-4.44%68.62%39.27%-1.35%26.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DLQAX and DBMYX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.82

The correlation between DLQAX and DBMYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLQAX vs. DBMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLQAX
DLQAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DLQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DLQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMYX
DBMYX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DBMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLQAXDBMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.12

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.70

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

2.13

+3.95

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLQAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the DBMYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLQAX and DBMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLQAX drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than DBMYX's maximum drawdown of -48.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLQAX and DBMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLQAXDBMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-48.24%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-19.58%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-25.20%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.77%

-45.79%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-48.24%

+13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-13.62%

+13.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-15.13%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

6.44%

-4.07%

Volatility

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) is 3.36%, while BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that DLQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLQAXDBMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

5.59%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

17.19%

-7.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

22.50%

-9.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

24.73%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

24.36%

-5.61%

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLQAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMYX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLQAX vs. DBMYX - Dividend Comparison

DLQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.39%, less than DBMYX's 47.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBMYX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y
47.75%51.19%0.43%0.00%0.00%8.97%7.86%0.00%8.66%9.12%2.20%6.55%
DLQAX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund
23.39%21.34%47.67%35.24%15.74%14.22%3.69%4.70%15.48%3.90%1.90%5.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLQAX and DBMYX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBMYX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to DLQAX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLQAX dropped -70.38% vs DBMYX's -48.24%.

DLQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLQAX and DBMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer