DLNV vs. ZMAY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DLNV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November) and ZMAY (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May) are both Defined Outcome funds. DLNV is passively managed, while ZMAY is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLNV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZMAY.

Performance

DLNV vs. ZMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLNV achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than ZMAY's 2.24% return.

DLNV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 5.52%
• 6M: 6.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMAY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLNV vs. ZMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November	5.52%	1.73%
ZMAY Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May	2.24%	0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DLNV and ZMAY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

DLNV vs. ZMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMAY

ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLNV vs. ZMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLNV	ZMAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.03	4.26	-2.22

Drawdowns

DLNV vs. ZMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLNV drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than ZMAY's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLNV and ZMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLNV	ZMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-0.39%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-0.05%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DLNV	ZMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.20%	1.45%	+5.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.20%	1.52%	+5.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.20%	1.52%	+5.68%

DLNV vs. ZMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLNV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMAY's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLNV vs. ZMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLNV nor ZMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLNV and ZMAY in my portfolio?

DLNV and ZMAY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DLNV or ZMAY?

On fees, ZMAY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLNV or ZMAY?

ZMAY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLNV or ZMAY?

DLNV and ZMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DLNV and ZMAY?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLNV and 0.79% for ZMAY.