DLNV vs. FTXL
DLNV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLNV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLNV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
DLNV vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLNV achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 120.03% return.
DLNV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 120.03%
- 6M
- 116.89%
- 1Y
- 197.54%
- 3Y*
- 59.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.20%
- 10Y*
- —
DLNV vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November | 5.60% | 1.88% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 120.03% | 13.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLNV and FTXL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLNV vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
DLNV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXL
DLNV vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLNV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 45.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLNV vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLNV drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLNV and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLNV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -43.87% | +39.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.06% | +4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -10.52% | +9.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility
DLNV vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLNV | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.08% | 41.73% | -34.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 37.31% | -30.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 34.85% | -27.77% |
DLNV vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLNV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLNV vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
DLNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.09% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLNV and FTXL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLNV.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for DLNV.
DLNV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTXL is Semiconductors. DLNV tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLNV and 0.60% for FTXL.
Find the right allocation for DLNV and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer