DLN vs. DIVZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DLN is passively managed, while DIVZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DLN returned 12.34%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for DIVZ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DLN charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.

Performance

DLN vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 4.54% return.

DLN

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 9.74%
• 6M: 8.74%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

DIVZ

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 11.08%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLN vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	9.74%	15.53%	19.66%	9.95%	-3.78%	25.65%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	4.54%	16.72%	18.44%	-0.51%	3.51%	19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DLN and DIVZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.86

The correlation between DLN and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLN vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DLN	DIVZ
Technology	22.8%	3.7%
Financial Services	17.4%	9.4%
Healthcare	12.6%	18.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.9%	19.5%
Energy	7.9%	14.7%
Industrials	7.8%	9.8%
Communication Services	7.5%	5.6%
Utilities	5.5%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	3.7%
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	5.7%

Return for Risk

DLN vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLN

DLN Risk / Return Rank: 79
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 80

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 36
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLN vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLN	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.18	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	1.72	+1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.20	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	1.91	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	4.51	+9.58

DLN vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLN and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DLN vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLN	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.84%	-15.42%	-42.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-5.83%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.71%	-9.52%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.26%	-15.42%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-3.17%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-3.48%	-4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	2.46%	-1.01%

Volatility

DLN vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) is 2.70%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLN	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	3.46%	-0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.99%	7.25%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.01%	9.48%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.26%	12.63%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	12.56%	+3.58%

DLN vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLN has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLN vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than DIVZ's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.56%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	1.80%	1.90%	2.00%	2.43%	2.53%	2.01%	2.66%	2.51%	2.90%	2.33%	2.64%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLN and DIVZ in my portfolio?

DLN and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLN or DIVZ?

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to DLN (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, DLN or DIVZ?

On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.34% vs 9.22% for DIVZ. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DLN or DIVZ?

Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLN or DIVZ?

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLN or DIVZ?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.80% for DLN.

What is the main difference between DLN and DIVZ?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DLN and 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.