DLLL vs. NVDL
DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. DLLL is passively managed, while NVDL is actively managed. Over the past year, DLLL returned 850.63% vs 84.82% for NVDL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
DLLL vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 757.76% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's 19.95% return.
DLLL
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- 245.92%
- YTD
- 757.76%
- 6M
- 648.38%
- 1Y
- 850.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- -7.15%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 84.82%
- 3Y*
- 109.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 757.76% | -3.72% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 19.95% | 43.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLLL and NVDL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.44 |
The correlation between DLLL and NVDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DLLL vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DLLL
NVDL
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DLLL
NVDL
-
Basic Materials
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Communication Services
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Consumer Defensive
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Energy
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Financial Services
DLLL
-
NVDL
Healthcare
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Industrials
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Real Estate
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Utilities
DLLL
-
NVDL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLLL vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
DLLL
NVDL
DLLL vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLLL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.23 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.02 | 2.02 | +13.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.34 | 4.63 | +26.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLLL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.65 | 1.25 | +5.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.16 | 1.77 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
DLLL vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLLL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.58% | -67.55% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.19% | -42.23% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.86% | -18.19% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.91% | -16.96% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.36% | 18.39% | +8.97% |
Volatility
DLLL vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 69.39% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) at 24.77%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLLL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 69.39% | 24.77% | +44.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.08% | 50.80% | +51.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 129.28% | 68.20% | +61.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 130.55% | 90.43% | +40.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 130.55% | 90.43% | +40.12% |
DLLL vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLLL vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DLLL nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLLL and NVDL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to NVDL (24.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs NVDL's -67.55%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 84.82% for NVDL. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 24.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 84.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 1.15% for NVDL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLLL and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer