DLLL vs. NVDL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. DLLL is passively managed, while NVDL is actively managed. Over the past year, DLLL returned 636.01% vs 20.66% for NVDL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.

Performance

DLLL vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 738.32% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's 4.65% return.

DLLL

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: 12.43%
• 6M: 819.94%
• YTD: 738.32%
• 1Y: 636.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDL

• 1D: -7.05%
• 1M: -3.55%
• 6M: 6.87%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 87.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	738.32%	-3.72%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	4.65%	52.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and NVDL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.43

DLLL vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DLLL	NVDL
Technology	66.6%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

DLLL vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 17
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLLL	NVDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.80	0.29	+4.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	0.91	+3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.11	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.22	0.49	+10.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.48	1.01	+21.47

DLLL vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLLL Sharpe Ratio is 4.80, which is higher than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLLL and NVDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and NVDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLLL	NVDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.58%	-67.55%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.19%	-42.23%	-14.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.70%	-28.63%	+7.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.71%	-17.27%	-8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.50%	20.50%	+8.00%

Volatility

DLLL vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 35.23% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) at 21.48%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLLL	NVDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.23%	21.48%	+13.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	106.21%	54.54%	+51.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.10%	71.21%	+62.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	129.72%	90.15%	+39.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	129.72%	90.15%	+39.57%

DLLL vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLLL vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLLL and NVDL in my portfolio?

DLLL and NVDL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLLL or NVDL?

DLLL has higher volatility (35.23%) compared to NVDL (21.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs NVDL's -67.55%.

Which ETF is better, DLLL or NVDL?

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 636.01% vs 20.66% for NVDL. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 21.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DLLL or NVDL?

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 636.01% return vs 20.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLLL or NVDL?

NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLLL or NVDL?

DLLL and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DLLL and NVDL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 1.05% for NVDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.