PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLLL vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLLL vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 757.76% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's 19.95% return.


DLLL

1D
-6.45%
1M
245.92%
YTD
757.76%
6M
648.38%
1Y
850.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDL

1D
-7.15%
1M
14.24%
YTD
19.95%
6M
27.27%
1Y
84.82%
3Y*
109.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and NVDL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.44

The correlation between DLLL and NVDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLLL vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLLL
NVDL

Technology

66.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DLLL
66.7%
NVDL

-

Basic Materials

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Communication Services

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Consumer Cyclical

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Consumer Defensive

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Energy

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Financial Services

DLLL

-

NVDL
100.0%

Healthcare

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Industrials

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Real Estate

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Utilities

DLLL

-

NVDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLLL vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLLLNVDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.23

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.02

2.02

+13.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.34

4.63

+26.71

DLLL vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLLL Sharpe Ratio is 6.65, which is higher than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLLL and NVDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLLLNVDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.65

1.25

+5.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.16

1.77

+1.39

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLLLNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.58%

-67.55%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.19%

-42.23%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.86%

-18.19%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-16.96%

-8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.36%

18.39%

+8.97%

Volatility

DLLL vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 69.39% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) at 24.77%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLLLNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

69.39%

24.77%

+44.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.08%

50.80%

+51.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.28%

68.20%

+61.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.55%

90.43%

+40.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.55%

90.43%

+40.12%

DLLL vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLLL vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLLL and NVDL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to NVDL (24.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs NVDL's -67.55%.

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 84.82% for NVDL. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 24.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 84.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

DLLL and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 1.15% for NVDL.

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLLL and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer