DLLL vs. ASMU

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DLLL is passively managed, while ASMU is actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ASMU.

Performance

DLLL vs. ASMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DLLL

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 17.49%
• 6M: 897.65%
• YTD: 823.06%
• 1Y: 669.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 340.66%

ASMU

• 1D: -3.01%
• 1M: -17.25%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	$4.13M	$6.41M	$4.81M
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	$26.78M	$35.64M	$53.41M

DLLL vs. ASMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	847.05%
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and ASMU is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

DLLL vs. ASMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ASMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLLL vs. ASMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLLL	ASMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.96	—	—

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. ASMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, which is greater than ASMU's maximum drawdown of -41.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and ASMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLLL	ASMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.58%	-41.09%	-27.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.68%	-30.90%	+18.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.73%	-14.64%	-11.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DLLL	ASMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	115.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	141.68%	106.27%	+35.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	133.25%	106.27%	+26.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	133.25%	106.27%	+26.98%

DLLL vs. ASMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMU's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLLL vs. ASMU - Dividend Comparison

DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF	0.63%
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLLL and ASMU in my portfolio?

DLLL and ASMU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DLLL or ASMU?

On fees, ASMU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLLL or ASMU?

ASMU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLLL or ASMU?

ASMU has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

What is the main difference between DLLL and ASMU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 0.97% for ASMU.