PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLLL vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLLL vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 757.76% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.21% return.


DLLL

1D
-6.45%
1M
245.92%
YTD
757.76%
6M
648.38%
1Y
850.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
757.76%-3.72%
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.21%4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and ACLO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLLL vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLLLACLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

3.41

-1.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.02

19.90

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.34

164.37

-133.03

DLLL vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLLL Sharpe Ratio is 6.65, which is comparable to the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLLL and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLLLACLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.65

7.29

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.16

5.10

-1.94

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLLLACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.58%

-1.01%

-67.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.19%

-0.27%

-56.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.86%

0.00%

-18.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-0.05%

-25.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.36%

0.03%

+27.33%

Volatility

DLLL vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 69.39% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLLLACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

69.39%

0.14%

+69.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.08%

0.57%

+101.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.28%

0.73%

+128.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.55%

1.08%

+129.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.55%

1.08%

+129.47%

DLLL vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLLL vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.


PositionTTM20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLLL and ACLO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

DLLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 6.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLLL and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer