PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLENX vs. SHLMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Local Markets (SHLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLENX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than SHLMX's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DLENX has outperformed SHLMX with an annualized return of 3.61%, while SHLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.


DLENX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.12%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.61%

SHLMX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.05%
YTD
1.29%
6M
2.66%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.16%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%
SHLMX
Virtus Stone Harbor Local Markets
1.29%19.32%-5.84%12.02%-11.67%-8.23%1.87%13.08%-9.29%15.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DLENX and SHLMX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLENX vs. SHLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLMX
SHLMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SHLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Local Markets (SHLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLENXSHLMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

1.69

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.86

2.45

+2.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.34

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

1.60

+1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.77

5.42

+8.35

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLENX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the SHLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLENX and SHLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLENXSHLMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

1.69

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.12

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.25

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.01

+0.94

Drawdowns

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLENX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum SHLMX drawdown of -37.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLENX and SHLMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLENXSHLMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-37.35%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.83%

-6.65%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-9.99%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-25.22%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.64%

-26.60%

+0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.67%

+10.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-18.50%

+14.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.96%

-1.50%

Volatility

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) is 0.68%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Local Markets (SHLMX) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that DLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLENXSHLMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

2.14%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

5.73%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

6.58%

-4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

8.01%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

8.96%

-4.30%

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLENX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLMX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLENX vs. SHLMX - Dividend Comparison

DLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, less than SHLMX's 10.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.32%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
SHLMX
Virtus Stone Harbor Local Markets
10.03%10.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.11%1.99%1.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLENX and SHLMX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLMX has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to DLENX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLENX dropped -25.64% vs SHLMX's -37.35%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLENX and SHLMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer