PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLENX vs. PLMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLENX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than PLMIX's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DLENX has underperformed PLMIX with an annualized return of 3.58%, while PLMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.92% annualized return.


DLENX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.61%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
3.58%

PLMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.05%
YTD
3.61%
6M
4.62%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.61%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%
PLMIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund
3.61%17.29%0.57%9.01%-4.12%-2.76%2.28%6.21%-4.43%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DLENX and PLMIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLENX vs. PLMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PLMIX
PLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLENXPLMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.37

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.36

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

8.85

+3.99

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLENX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the PLMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLENX and PLMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLENX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum PLMIX drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLENX and PLMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLENXPLMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-28.76%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.83%

-4.70%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-4.70%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-13.95%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.64%

-17.50%

-8.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.16%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-5.71%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.25%

-0.79%

Volatility

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) is 0.55%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund (PLMIX) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that DLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLENXPLMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

1.93%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

4.96%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

5.87%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

6.03%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

6.32%

-1.67%

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLENX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PLMIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLENX vs. PLMIX - Dividend Comparison

DLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, less than PLMIX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.30%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
PLMIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund
8.43%7.44%7.08%6.40%1.97%1.47%1.63%4.10%12.65%2.82%2.88%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLENX and PLMIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLMIX has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to DLENX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLENX dropped -25.64% vs PLMIX's -28.76%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLENX and PLMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer