DLDRX vs. OEPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX).
DLDRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Oct 30, 2003. OEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 4, 2006.
Performance
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund | 22.69% | 15.04% | 0.81% | 1.58% | 34.18% | 38.30% | 6.58% | 16.64% | -17.57% | 14.05% |
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 65.25% | -1.85% | -15.41% | -3.76% | 88.50% | 14.90% | -91.88% | -4.45% | -58.58% | -22.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLDRX achieves a 22.69% return, which is significantly lower than OEPIX's 65.25% return. Over the past 10 years, DLDRX has outperformed OEPIX with an annualized return of 14.33%, while OEPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -20.24% annualized return.
DLDRX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 22.69%
- 6M
- 31.63%
- 1Y
- 47.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
OEPIX
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 65.25%
- 6M
- 96.48%
- 1Y
- 90.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- -20.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLDRX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than OEPIX's 1.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLDRX vs. OEPIX — Risk / Return Rank
DLDRX
OEPIX
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLDRX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.52 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 1.97 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.18 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 5.61 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLDRX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.52 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.30 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | -0.30 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -0.25 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLDRX and OEPIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Dividend Comparison
DLDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than OEPIX's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund | 1.90% | 2.33% | 7.45% | 12.42% | 9.66% | 5.07% | 1.11% | 2.16% | 1.87% | 0.63% | 1.44% | 1.25% |
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 0.53% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLDRX drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, smaller than the maximum OEPIX drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLDRX and OEPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLDRX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -99.30% | +30.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.88% | -39.36% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.44% | -65.50% | +33.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.24% | -97.79% | +43.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -97.86% | +95.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -71.84% | +50.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 15.28% | -10.69% |
Volatility
DLDRX vs. OEPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) is 6.07%, while Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that DLDRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLDRX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 11.57% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.19% | 33.14% | -17.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.61% | 60.15% | -33.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 57.70% | -31.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 66.61% | -41.04% |