PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLDRX vs. DQIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund (DQIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLDRX achieves a 25.52% return, which is significantly higher than DQIRX's 14.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DLDRX having a 14.07% annualized return and DQIRX not far ahead at 14.58%.


DLDRX

1D
1.00%
1M
1.07%
YTD
25.52%
6M
30.23%
1Y
53.26%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
14.07%

DQIRX

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.02%
YTD
14.88%
6M
15.41%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
14.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
25.52%15.04%0.81%1.58%34.18%38.30%6.58%16.64%-17.57%14.05%
DQIRX
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund
14.88%19.01%26.93%19.21%-9.35%29.13%4.81%24.98%-3.60%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DLDRX and DQIRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between DLDRX and DQIRX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLDRX vs. DQIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLDRX
DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DQIRX
DQIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DQIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DQIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DQIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DQIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DQIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund (DQIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLDRXDQIRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

3.24

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.89

4.32

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.60

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

5.17

+2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.68

22.69

-0.02

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLDRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the DQIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLDRX and DQIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLDRXDQIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

3.24

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.00

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.84

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.58

-0.18

Drawdowns

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLDRX drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than DQIRX's maximum drawdown of -50.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLDRX and DQIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLDRXDQIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.13%

-50.77%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-6.79%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-18.48%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-20.34%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.24%

-36.82%

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.09%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-6.94%

-13.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

1.55%

+0.82%

Volatility

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund (DQIRX) at 2.53%. This indicates that DLDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DQIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLDRXDQIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

2.53%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

7.95%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

10.93%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.64%

15.83%

+9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

17.39%

+8.10%

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLDRX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DQIRX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLDRX vs. DQIRX - Dividend Comparison

DLDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than DQIRX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
1.86%2.33%7.45%12.42%9.66%5.07%1.11%2.16%1.87%0.63%1.44%1.25%
DQIRX
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund
2.83%3.12%7.05%4.56%6.54%2.61%3.42%2.50%5.29%8.45%4.04%8.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLDRX and DQIRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLDRX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to DQIRX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLDRX dropped -69.13% vs DQIRX's -50.77%.

DQIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLDRX and DQIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer