PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLB vs. FFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DLB vs. FFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLB achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly lower than FFIV's 55.20% return. Over the past 10 years, DLB has underperformed FFIV with an annualized return of 2.40%, while FFIV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


DLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-17.26%
6M
-21.32%
1Y
-27.49%
3Y*
-13.16%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
2.40%

FFIV

1D
0.59%
1M
9.26%
YTD
55.20%
6M
50.82%
1Y
38.22%
3Y*
38.11%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLB vs. FFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
-17.26%-16.27%-7.95%23.82%-24.90%-0.99%42.99%12.63%0.78%38.73%
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
55.20%1.51%40.50%24.72%-41.36%39.09%25.99%-13.81%23.48%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DLB and FFIV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2005

0.40

The correlation between DLB and FFIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DLB:

$5.02B

FFIV:

$22.70B

EPS

DLB:

$2.53

FFIV:

$12.19

PE Ratio

DLB:

20.79

FFIV:

32.50

PEG Ratio

DLB:

30.68

FFIV:

1.42

PS Ratio

DLB:

3.71

FFIV:

9.54

PB Ratio

DLB:

1.92

FFIV:

6.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLB:

$1.36B

FFIV:

$2.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLB:

$1.19B

FFIV:

$2.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

DLB:

$347.35M

FFIV:

$889.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLB vs. FFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLB
DLB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLB Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FFIV
FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLB vs. FFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLBFFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.21

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

1.04

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.93

2.28

-4.21

DLB vs. FFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLB Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the FFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLB and FFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLB vs. FFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLB drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, smaller than the maximum FFIV drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLB and FFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLBFFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.19%

-97.59%

+35.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.11%

-34.73%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.92%

-34.73%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.41%

-47.42%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.04%

-54.59%

+9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.04%

-3.17%

-41.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-40.16%

+17.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.84%

15.77%

-0.93%

Volatility

DLB vs. FFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) is 6.02%, while F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that DLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLBFFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

8.89%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.37%

24.72%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

33.48%

-8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.03%

29.97%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.61%

29.56%

-2.95%

Dividends

DLB vs. FFIV - Dividend Comparison

DLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
2.68%2.10%1.57%1.29%1.45%0.96%0.91%1.15%1.08%0.94%1.11%1.25%
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DLB vs. FFIV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and F5 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
395.63M
0
(DLB) Total Revenue
(FFIV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DLB and FFIV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFIV has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to DLB (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLB dropped -62.19% vs FFIV's -97.59%.

FFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLB and FFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer