PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLAG vs. PMAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLAG vs. PMAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - August (DLAG) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLAG achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than PMAU's 2.78% return.


DLAG

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.63%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMAU

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.47%
YTD
2.78%
6M
3.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLAG vs. PMAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DLAG and PMAU is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLAG vs. PMAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - August (DLAG) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DLAG vs. PMAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLAGPMAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

2.78

-1.23

Drawdowns

DLAG vs. PMAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLAG drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, which is greater than PMAU's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLAG and PMAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLAGPMAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-1.79%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.19%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-0.17%

-0.39%

Volatility

DLAG vs. PMAU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLAGPMAUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.54%

2.51%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

2.51%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.54%

2.51%

+4.03%

DLAG vs. PMAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLAG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAU's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLAG vs. PMAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLAG nor PMAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DLAG and PMAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PMAU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMAU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLAG.

DLAG and PMAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLAG and 0.50% for PMAU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLAG and PMAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer