PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DL2P.L is traded in GBp, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


DL2P.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.86%
6M
-9.94%
YTD
-4.56%
1Y
-3.84%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
12.86%

LDGL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.70%
6M
11.58%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DL2P.L and LDGL.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DL2P.L
DL2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LDGL.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DL2P.LLDGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DL2P.L drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DL2P.L and LDGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DL2P.LLDGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.02%

-8.76%

-54.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.64%

-0.40%

-10.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.32%

-2.20%

-14.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.50%

Volatility

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DL2P.LLDGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.14%

13.76%

+17.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.71%

13.76%

+19.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.50%

13.76%

+21.74%

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DL2P.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DL2P.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison

DL2P.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DL2P.L and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DL2P.L.

DL2P.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LDGL.L is Global Equity Income. DL2P.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DL2P.L and 0.29% for LDGL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DL2P.L and LDGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer