DKNX vs. QTUM
DKNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long DKNG ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DKNX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. DKNX is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DKNX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
DKNX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DKNX achieves a -60.97% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 30.78% return.
DKNX
- 1D
- -3.74%
- 1M
- -27.78%
- 6M
- -62.51%
- YTD
- -60.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- YTD
- 30.78%
- 1Y
- 54.31%
- 3Y*
- 40.96%
- 5Y*
- 25.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DKNX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DKNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long DKNG ETF | -60.97% | -52.72% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 30.78% | 17.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DKNX and QTUM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DKNX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
DKNX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
DKNX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long DKNG ETF (DKNX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DKNX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DKNX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DKNX drawdown since its inception was -86.10%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DKNX and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DKNX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.10% | -38.45% | -47.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.78% | -15.19% | -67.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.55% | -8.22% | -52.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.76% | — |
Volatility
DKNX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DKNX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.92% | 30.57% | +70.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.92% | 27.47% | +73.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.92% | 27.59% | +73.33% |
DKNX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DKNX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DKNX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
DKNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DKNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long DKNG ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.82% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DKNX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for DKNX.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for DKNX.
DKNX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for DKNX and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for DKNX and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer