DJUN vs. QMAR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR).

DJUN and QMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJUN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.

Performance

DJUN vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DJUN vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June	-0.21%	9.38%	13.92%	17.58%	-6.30%	4.81%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	2.45%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	12.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJUN achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 2.45% return.

DJUN

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 12.29%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 4.74%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUN vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

QMAR

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

DJUN

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June

Return for Risk

DJUN vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUN

DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 69
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 84
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUN vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DJUN	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.44	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	2.29	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.47	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.11	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.47	14.64	-6.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DJUN vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUN and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DJUN	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.44	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.76	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.77	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between DJUN and QMAR is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DJUN vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJUN nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DJUN vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUN drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUN and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DJUN	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-19.83%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.33%	-9.23%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.96%	-19.83%	+7.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.32%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-3.39%	+1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	1.33%	0.00%

Volatility

DJUN vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) is 2.86%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that DJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DJUN	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	3.53%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.79%	4.65%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.23%	13.26%	-3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.50%	14.04%	-5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.16%	14.02%	-5.86%