PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJUN vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJUN vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DJUN having a 5.83% return and DMAY slightly higher at 5.88%.


DJUN

1D
0.74%
1M
1.75%
6M
5.28%
YTD
5.83%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.52%

DMAY

1D
0.73%
1M
1.76%
6M
5.32%
YTD
5.88%
1Y
10.60%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$874.80K$1.72M$2.17M
$398.26K$461.78K$1.83M

DJUN vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
5.83%9.38%13.92%17.58%-6.30%6.27%6.78%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
5.88%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DJUN and DMAY is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020

0.90

The correlation between DJUN and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJUN vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DJUN
DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DJUN vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJUNDMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.41

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.19

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.84

16.15

+2.69

DJUN vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUN and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJUN vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUN drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum DMAY drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUN and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJUNDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-13.90%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-3.36%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-12.38%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

-13.90%

+1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-2.20%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.66%

-0.11%

Volatility

DJUN vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) is 1.93%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that DJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJUNDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

2.05%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.05%

4.83%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.80%

5.54%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.55%

9.11%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

8.41%

-0.41%

DJUN vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJUN and DMAY have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

DJUN vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJUN nor DMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DJUN and DMAY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMAY has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to DJUN (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUN dropped -11.96% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

On 5-year performance, DJUN leads with 8.22% vs 7.14% for DMAY. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DJUN has performed better with a 8.22% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJUN and DMAY have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

DJUN and DMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index.

DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJUN and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer