DJUN vs. CPSP
DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) and CPSP (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - DJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index, while CPSP is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Calamos. DJUN is passively managed, while CPSP is actively managed. Over the past year, DJUN returned 9.49% vs 6.33% for CPSP. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSP.
Performance
DJUN vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJUN achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than CPSP's 3.49% return.
DJUN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 9.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CPSP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJUN vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 4.58% | 12.76% |
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | 3.49% | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJUN and CPSP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between DJUN and CPSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJUN vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank
DJUN
CPSP
DJUN vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DJUN | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 2.17 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 16.96 | -13.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.41 | 73.97 | -55.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DJUN vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJUN drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUN and CPSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJUN | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -1.73% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -0.37% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -0.09% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 0.09% | +0.43% |
Volatility
DJUN vs. CPSP - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) at 0.33%. This indicates that DJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJUN | CPSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 0.33% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 0.87% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 1.34% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.53% | 2.33% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 2.33% | +5.67% |
DJUN vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJUN vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DJUN nor CPSP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DJUN and CPSP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DJUN has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to CPSP (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUN dropped -11.96% vs CPSP's -1.73%.
On 1-year performance, DJUN leads with 9.49% vs 6.33% for CPSP. On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DJUN has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
DJUN and CPSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CPSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUN and 0.69% for CPSP.
CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.74 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJUN and CPSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer