PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJUL vs. XIMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJUL vs. XIMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJUL achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than XIMR's 4.25% return.


DJUL

1D
0.04%
1M
1.61%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.60%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*

XIMR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.82%
YTD
4.25%
6M
4.83%
1Y
8.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUL vs. XIMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJUL and XIMR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.67

The correlation between DJUL and XIMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJUL vs. XIMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUL
DJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUL vs. XIMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJULXIMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

2.40

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

7.95

-4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.56

68.29

-47.73

DJUL vs. XIMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is lower than the XIMR Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUL and XIMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJULXIMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

4.27

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.73

-0.62

Drawdowns

DJUL vs. XIMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUL drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, which is greater than XIMR's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUL and XIMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJULXIMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-5.12%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

-1.08%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-0.17%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.13%

+0.66%

Volatility

DJUL vs. XIMR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) at 0.32%. This indicates that DJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJULXIMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.32%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

1.63%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

2.02%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

4.36%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

4.36%

+3.58%

DJUL vs. XIMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJUL and XIMR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

DJUL vs. XIMR - Dividend Comparison

DJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DJUL and XIMR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJUL has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to XIMR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUL dropped -12.54% vs XIMR's -5.12%.

On 1-year performance, DJUL leads with 16.12% vs 8.57% for XIMR. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, XIMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DJUL has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJUL and XIMR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 0.00% for DJUL.

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJUL and XIMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer