PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DJEU.L is traded in USD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJEU.L achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, DJEU.L has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 12.95%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.33% annualized return.


DJEU.L

1D
1.28%
1M
4.97%
YTD
7.17%
6M
8.33%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
12.95%

CSH2.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
1.49%
6M
2.83%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
1.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJEU.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR
7.17%14.30%15.00%15.81%-7.53%22.07%9.31%26.31%-7.43%28.27%
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP
1.49%12.57%3.85%10.24%-9.32%-0.78%3.37%4.86%-5.00%9.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DJEU.L and CSH2.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2015

0.14

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJEU.L
CSH2.L

Financial Services

27.2%
10.4%

Industrials

18.4%
6.3%

Technology

17.1%
35.9%

Healthcare

13.1%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.0%

Energy

2.4%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.9%
13.9%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

DJEU.L
27.2%
CSH2.L
10.4%

Industrials

DJEU.L
18.4%
CSH2.L
6.3%

Technology

DJEU.L
17.1%
CSH2.L
35.9%

Healthcare

DJEU.L
13.1%
CSH2.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DJEU.L
11.6%
CSH2.L
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

DJEU.L
4.4%
CSH2.L
4.9%

Basic Materials

DJEU.L
4.0%
CSH2.L
1.0%

Energy

DJEU.L
2.4%
CSH2.L
1.4%

Communication Services

DJEU.L
1.9%
CSH2.L
13.9%

Real Estate

DJEU.L

-

CSH2.L
0.0%

Utilities

DJEU.L

-

CSH2.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJEU.L
DJEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DJEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJEU.LCSH2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.09

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

0.82

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.99

1.79

+10.19

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJEU.L and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJEU.LCSH2.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

0.51

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.30

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

0.14

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.07

+1.11

Drawdowns

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJEU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.73%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -29.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJEU.L and CSH2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJEU.LCSH2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.73%

-29.83%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-4.11%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-7.81%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-23.98%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.73%

-25.51%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.62%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-12.73%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

1.88%

+2.87%

Volatility

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 1.81%. This indicates that DJEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJEU.LCSH2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

1.81%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

4.94%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

6.62%

+7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

8.55%

+9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

9.36%

+14.74%

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJEU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJEU.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

DJEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DJEU.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR
0.73%0.78%1.18%1.04%1.74%1.14%1.55%1.28%1.98%1.65%2.33%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJEU.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJEU.L.

DJEU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DJEU.L and 0.07% for CSH2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJEU.L and CSH2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer