DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L
DJEU.L (Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR) and ACWL.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DJEU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while ACWL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DJEU.L returned 12.80%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for ACWL.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DJEU.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACWL.L.
Performance
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DJEU.L is traded in USD, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJEU.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ACWL.L's 12.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DJEU.L having a 12.80% annualized return and ACWL.L not far ahead at 12.87%.
DJEU.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
ACWL.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJEU.L Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR | 5.81% | 14.30% | 15.00% | 15.81% | -7.53% | 22.07% | 9.31% | 26.31% | -7.43% | 28.27% |
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 12.18% | 21.83% | 19.36% | 17.72% | -16.89% | 20.41% | 14.43% | 19.77% | -1.48% | 19.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJEU.L and ACWL.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, DJEU.L and ACWL.L have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Industrials
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Technology
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Healthcare
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Consumer Cyclical
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Consumer Defensive
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Basic Materials
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Energy
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Communication Services
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
Real Estate
DJEU.L
-
ACWL.L
Utilities
DJEU.L
-
ACWL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank
DJEU.L
ACWL.L
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJEU.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.06 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 13.97 | -2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJEU.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.57 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.28 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 2.00 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.80 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJEU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.73%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJEU.L and ACWL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJEU.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.73% | -25.82% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -9.55% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | -17.33% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -25.82% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.73% | -25.82% | -10.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.56% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -2.78% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 2.10% | +2.65% |
Volatility
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) is 3.23%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that DJEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJEU.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 3.45% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 8.77% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 11.41% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.93% | 21.92% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 28.23% | -4.13% |
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJEU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison
DJEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while ACWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DJEU.L Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR | 0.74% | 0.78% | 1.18% | 1.04% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 1.65% | 2.33% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJEU.L and ACWL.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWL.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWL.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJEU.L.
DJEU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWL.L is Global Equities. DJEU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DJEU.L and 0.45% for ACWL.L.
Find the right allocation for DJEU.L and ACWL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer