PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DJEU.L is traded in USD, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJEU.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ACWL.L's 12.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DJEU.L having a 12.80% annualized return and ACWL.L not far ahead at 12.87%.


DJEU.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.60%
YTD
5.81%
6M
7.92%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
12.80%

ACWL.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
4.94%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.32%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJEU.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR
5.81%14.30%15.00%15.81%-7.53%22.07%9.31%26.31%-7.43%28.27%
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
12.18%21.83%19.36%17.72%-16.89%20.41%14.43%19.77%-1.48%19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DJEU.L and ACWL.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015

0.22

Over the past year, DJEU.L and ACWL.L have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJEU.L
ACWL.L

Financial Services

27.2%
16.2%

Industrials

18.4%
10.9%

Technology

17.1%
29.3%

Healthcare

13.1%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.7%

Energy

2.4%
4.2%

Communication Services

1.9%
9.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

DJEU.L
27.2%
ACWL.L
16.2%

Industrials

DJEU.L
18.4%
ACWL.L
10.9%

Technology

DJEU.L
17.1%
ACWL.L
29.3%

Healthcare

DJEU.L
13.1%
ACWL.L
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DJEU.L
11.6%
ACWL.L
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

DJEU.L
4.4%
ACWL.L
5.0%

Basic Materials

DJEU.L
4.0%
ACWL.L
3.7%

Energy

DJEU.L
2.4%
ACWL.L
4.2%

Communication Services

DJEU.L
1.9%
ACWL.L
9.0%

Real Estate

DJEU.L

-

ACWL.L
1.8%

Utilities

DJEU.L

-

ACWL.L
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJEU.L
DJEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DJEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWL.L
ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJEU.LACWL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.06

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

13.97

-2.76

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJEU.L and ACWL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJEU.LACWL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.57

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

1.28

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

2.00

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.80

-0.63

Drawdowns

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJEU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.73%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJEU.L and ACWL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJEU.LACWL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.73%

-25.82%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-9.55%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-17.33%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-25.82%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.73%

-25.82%

-10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.56%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-2.78%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

2.10%

+2.65%

Volatility

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEU.L) is 3.23%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that DJEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJEU.LACWL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.45%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

8.77%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

11.41%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

21.92%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

28.23%

-4.13%

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJEU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJEU.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison

DJEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while ACWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DJEU.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR
0.74%0.78%1.18%1.04%1.74%1.14%1.55%1.28%1.98%1.65%2.33%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJEU.L and ACWL.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWL.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWL.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJEU.L.

DJEU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWL.L is Global Equities. DJEU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DJEU.L and 0.45% for ACWL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJEU.L and ACWL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer