PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DJEL.L vs. UC95.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DJEL.L (Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR) and UC95.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Amundi and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DJEL.L returned 13.70%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for UC95.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DJEL.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC95.L.

Performance

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJEL.L achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than UC95.L's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, DJEL.L has outperformed UC95.L with an annualized return of 13.70%, while UC95.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.

DJEL.L

1D
1.30%
1M
4.88%
YTD
7.34%
6M
7.22%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
13.70%

UC95.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.02%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJEL.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR		7.34%6.63%16.67%9.42%3.64%21.33%5.44%23.49%-1.44%14.87%
UC95.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		-0.22%-0.82%15.46%0.42%4.20%26.08%0.43%24.54%3.98%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DJEL.L and UC95.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.54

The correlation between DJEL.L and UC95.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DJEL.L
UC95.L

Financial Services

27.2%
15.3%

Industrials

18.4%
12.9%

Technology

17.1%
7.0%

Healthcare

13.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
16.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.7%

Energy

2.4%

-

Communication Services

1.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

-

8.0%

Utilities

-

19.4%

Financial Services

DJEL.L
27.2%
UC95.L
15.3%

Industrials

DJEL.L
18.4%
UC95.L
12.9%

Technology

DJEL.L
17.1%
UC95.L
7.0%

Healthcare

DJEL.L
13.1%
UC95.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DJEL.L
11.6%
UC95.L
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

DJEL.L
4.4%
UC95.L
16.1%

Basic Materials

DJEL.L
4.0%
UC95.L
1.7%

Energy

DJEL.L
2.4%
UC95.L

-

Communication Services

DJEL.L
1.9%
UC95.L
3.0%

Real Estate

DJEL.L

-

UC95.L
8.0%

Utilities

DJEL.L

-

UC95.L
19.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with DJEL.L:
DJEL.L vs. SCHDDJEL.L vs. DGRP.LDJEL.L vs. HSUS.LDJEL.L vs. CSH2.LDJEL.L vs. FLXU.LDJEL.L vs. 100D.LDJEL.L vs. BBUS.L
Often compared with UC95.L:
UC95.L vs. ISDU.LUC95.L vs. USFM.LUC95.L vs. CU2U.LUC95.L vs. FLXU.LUC95.L vs. XZMD.LUC95.L vs. 5HEP.LUC95.L vs. XMUS.L

Return for Risk

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DJEL.L
DJEL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DJEL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
UC95.L
UC95.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UC95.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC95.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC95.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UC95.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC95.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DJEL.LUC95.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.16
0.10

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.11
0.22

+2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.02

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

0.11

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

0.30

+10.58

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJEL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the UC95.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJEL.L and UC95.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DJEL.LUC95.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

0.10

+2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.59

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.71

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.80

+0.42

Drawdowns

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJEL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, roughly equal to the maximum UC95.L drawdown of -28.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJEL.L and UC95.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DJEL.LUC95.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.44%

-28.11%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.92%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

-10.14%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.99%

-11.32%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.44%

-28.11%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.45%

+7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-4.11%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

3.26%

-1.08%

Volatility

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEL.L) is 2.90%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that DJEL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC95.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DJEL.LUC95.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.56%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

7.62%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

9.90%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

11.91%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

13.94%

+4.54%

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJEL.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UC95.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DJEL.L vs. UC95.L - Dividend Comparison

DJEL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than UC95.L's 1.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJEL.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR		0.74%0.79%1.16%1.05%1.74%1.14%1.60%1.30%1.93%1.70%2.22%2.44%
UC95.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.89%1.99%1.61%1.54%1.29%1.13%1.79%1.66%1.64%1.68%1.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DJEL.L and UC95.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC95.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC95.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJEL.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DJEL.L and 0.25% for UC95.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJEL.L and UC95.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer