DIVZ vs. MARZ
DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and MARZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVZ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while MARZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Index. DIVZ is actively managed, while MARZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVZ returned 8.50%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for MARZ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MARZ.
Performance
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than MARZ's 8.46% return.
DIVZ
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 10.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
MARZ
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 3.37% | 16.72% | 18.44% | -0.51% | 3.51% | 16.69% |
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | 8.46% | 12.90% | 17.90% | 20.37% | -12.70% | 17.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVZ and MARZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2021 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIVZ and MARZ has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVZ vs. MARZ — Risk / Return Rank
DIVZ
MARZ
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVZ | MARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 2.22 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 3.06 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.92 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 12.65 | -7.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVZ | MARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.22 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.89 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.95 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum MARZ drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and MARZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVZ | MARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -18.89% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -7.45% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.52% | -14.84% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -18.89% | +3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | 0.00% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -4.02% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.72% | +0.61% |
Volatility
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Volatility Comparison
Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) at 2.31%. This indicates that DIVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVZ | MARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.31% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 7.45% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 9.69% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 12.29% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.57% | 12.21% | +0.36% |
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MARZ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVZ vs. MARZ - Dividend Comparison
DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than MARZ's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.59% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | 3.04% | 3.30% | 4.55% | 7.33% | 0.78% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVZ and MARZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVZ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to MARZ (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVZ dropped -15.42% vs MARZ's -18.89%.
On 5-year performance, MARZ leads with 10.91% vs 8.50% for DIVZ. On fees, DIVZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, MARZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MARZ has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MARZ.
MARZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 2.59% for DIVZ.
DIVZ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MARZ is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.79% for MARZ.
MARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVZ and MARZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer