DIVZ vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVZ returned 8.50%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than FUNL's 5.66% return.

DIVZ

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 10.65%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.88%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	3.37%	16.72%	18.44%	-0.51%	3.51%	19.74%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	14.33%	-5.76%	24.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVZ and FUNL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between DIVZ and FUNL has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVZ	FUNL
Consumer Defensive	20.0%	7.0%
Energy	19.4%	7.6%
Utilities	17.2%	5.0%
Healthcare	16.0%	15.3%
Financial Services	8.7%	19.3%
Technology	8.0%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	6.5%
Communication Services	5.9%	5.8%
Basic Materials	5.7%	2.2%
Industrials	4.6%	11.5%
Real Estate	-	4.5%

Return for Risk

DIVZ vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 81
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIVZ	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.30	-1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	3.41	-1.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.49	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	5.42	-3.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.83	25.33	-20.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVZ and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIVZ	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.30	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.63	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.95	-0.06

Drawdowns

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVZ	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.42%	-19.35%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.83%	-3.83%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.52%	-17.37%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	-19.35%	+3.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.25%	-0.12%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-3.54%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	0.82%	+1.51%

Volatility

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DIVZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVZ	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	0.00%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.06%	5.25%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.29%	8.82%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	15.16%	-2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.57%	15.30%	-2.73%

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVZ vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.59%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVZ and FUNL in my portfolio?

DIVZ and FUNL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVZ or FUNL?

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVZ dropped -15.42% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, DIVZ or FUNL?

On 5-year performance, FUNL leads with 9.54% vs 8.50% for DIVZ. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVZ or FUNL?

Over the 5-year period, FUNL has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVZ or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVZ or FUNL?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.25% for FUNL.

What is the main difference between DIVZ and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.