DIVZ vs. CAMX
DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIVZ returned 14.93%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for CAMX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAMX.
Performance
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than CAMX's 10.41% return.
DIVZ
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- —
CAMX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 11.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 16.72% | 18.44% | -1.45% |
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 10.41% | 9.49% | 12.50% | 9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVZ and CAMX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIVZ and CAMX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVZ
CAMX
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
DIVZ
CAMX
Healthcare
DIVZ
CAMX
Energy
DIVZ
CAMX
Utilities
DIVZ
CAMX
-
Industrials
DIVZ
CAMX
Financial Services
DIVZ
CAMX
Basic Materials
DIVZ
CAMX
Communication Services
DIVZ
CAMX
Consumer Cyclical
DIVZ
CAMX
Technology
DIVZ
CAMX
Real Estate
DIVZ
-
CAMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVZ vs. CAMX — Risk / Return Rank
DIVZ
CAMX
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVZ | CAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.99 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 3.28 | +1.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CAMX drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and CAMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVZ | CAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -15.71% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -11.79% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.52% | -15.71% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -1.12% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -2.70% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.57% | -1.07% |
Volatility
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) is 3.74%, while Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that DIVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVZ | CAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.29% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 10.81% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 14.06% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 14.47% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 14.47% | -1.91% |
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CAMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVZ vs. CAMX - Dividend Comparison
DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than CAMX's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.53% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVZ and CAMX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to DIVZ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVZ dropped -15.42% vs CAMX's -15.71%.
On 3-year performance, DIVZ leads with 14.93% vs 13.10% for CAMX. On fees, CAMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DIVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIVZ has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.64% for CAMX.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Cambiar Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.59% for CAMX.
DIVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVZ and CAMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer