DIVZ vs. BEDY
DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BEDY.
Performance
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than BEDY's 10.77% return.
DIVZ
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 10.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
BEDY
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 3.37% | 1.27% |
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 10.77% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVZ and BEDY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVZ vs. BEDY — Risk / Return Rank
DIVZ
BEDY
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 2.36 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than BEDY's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and BEDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -6.25% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | 0.00% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -1.37% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 12.02% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 12.02% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.57% | 12.02% | +0.55% |
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BEDY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Dividend Comparison
DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than BEDY's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.34% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.59% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVZ and BEDY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEDY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEDY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.59% for DIVZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.50% for BEDY.
Find the right allocation for DIVZ and BEDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer