DIVZ vs. BEDY
DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BEDY.
Performance
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVZ achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than BEDY's 12.52% return.
DIVZ
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
BEDY
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 4.86% | 0.90% |
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 12.52% | 1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVZ and BEDY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVZ vs. BEDY — Risk / Return Rank
DIVZ
BEDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than BEDY's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and BEDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -6.25% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -0.35% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -1.27% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVZ | BEDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 12.11% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 12.11% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 12.11% | +0.45% |
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BEDY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVZ vs. BEDY - Dividend Comparison
DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than BEDY's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.29% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.55% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVZ and BEDY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEDY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEDY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.55% for DIVZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.50% for BEDY.
Find the right allocation for DIVZ and BEDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer