DIVS vs. DBO
DIVS (SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. DIVS is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVS returned 9.05%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for DBO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
DIVS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVS achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
DIVS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
DIVS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 6.44% | 11.66% | 12.60% | 15.98% | -8.97% | 17.52% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 25.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVS and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021 | 0.04 |
The correlation between DIVS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIVS vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVS
DBO
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
DIVS
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
DIVS
DBO
-
Technology
DIVS
DBO
-
Financial Services
DIVS
DBO
Healthcare
DIVS
DBO
-
Communication Services
DIVS
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIVS
DBO
-
Basic Materials
DIVS
-
DBO
-
Energy
DIVS
-
DBO
-
Real Estate
DIVS
-
DBO
-
Utilities
DIVS
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
DIVS
DBO
DIVS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 4.44 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 9.02 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 2.34 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.02 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
DIVS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVS drawdown since its inception was -29.55%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.55% | -90.18% | +60.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -18.19% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -28.20% | +15.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.71% | -37.68% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -51.38% | +49.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -62.25% | +58.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 8.92% | -5.96% |
Volatility
DIVS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) is 2.95%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that DIVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 12.61% | -9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 28.20% | -19.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 34.46% | -24.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 32.29% | -19.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 31.78% | -5.56% |
DIVS vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
DIVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 2.62% | 2.61% | 2.66% | 3.14% | 5.93% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVS and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to DIVS (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVS dropped -29.55% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 9.05% for DIVS. On fees, DIVS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DIVS has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DIVS has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
DIVS is categorized as Global Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVS and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVS and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer