PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Active Canadian Preferred Share Fund (DIVS.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVS.TO achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.


DIVS.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.27%
YTD
3.58%
6M
5.12%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*

XDIV.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
3.65%
YTD
19.17%
6M
18.94%
1Y
38.61%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DIVS.TO
Evolve Active Canadian Preferred Share Fund
3.58%14.93%24.96%12.11%-7.19%26.99%-1.19%-1.14%-12.33%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
19.17%24.92%19.56%11.71%0.29%32.25%-7.81%24.84%-10.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVS.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018

0.23

The correlation between DIVS.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVS.TO
XDIV.TO

Energy

100.0%
28.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

46.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

11.3%

Energy

DIVS.TO
100.0%
XDIV.TO
28.8%

Basic Materials

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Communication Services

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Financial Services

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO
46.7%

Healthcare

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Industrials

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Real Estate

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO

-

Technology

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO
1.3%

Utilities

DIVS.TO

-

XDIV.TO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVS.TO
DIVS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIVS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Active Canadian Preferred Share Fund (DIVS.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVS.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

2.03

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

16.64

-9.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.66

56.55

-28.88

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVS.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVS.TOXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

4.94

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

1.57

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.81

-0.33

Drawdowns

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVS.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.95%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS.TO and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVS.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.95%

-41.30%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-2.33%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.50%

-10.53%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.73%

-17.60%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.09%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-4.25%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.69%

-0.14%

Volatility

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Active Canadian Preferred Share Fund (DIVS.TO) is 1.05%, while iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that DIVS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVS.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

2.81%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

6.36%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

7.85%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.77%

10.53%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.41%

16.01%

-2.60%

Dividends

DIVS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

DIVS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVS.TO
Evolve Active Canadian Preferred Share Fund
5.38%5.32%8.60%11.61%15.44%10.35%5.37%5.00%4.70%0.00%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.28%3.81%4.29%4.20%3.95%3.58%4.58%4.02%4.85%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVS.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVS.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer