PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVP vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVP vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVP achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.


DIVP

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.18%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.10%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVP vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIVP and OMAH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.71

The correlation between DIVP and OMAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVP vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVP
OMAH

Healthcare

17.9%
7.0%

Financial Services

16.1%
38.9%

Energy

11.6%
10.5%

Industrials

9.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
16.2%

Technology

8.6%
13.6%

Communication Services

8.0%
9.8%

Real Estate

6.5%

-

Utilities

6.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Healthcare

DIVP
17.9%
OMAH
7.0%

Financial Services

DIVP
16.1%
OMAH
38.9%

Energy

DIVP
11.6%
OMAH
10.5%

Industrials

DIVP
9.3%
OMAH

-

Consumer Defensive

DIVP
9.0%
OMAH
16.2%

Technology

DIVP
8.6%
OMAH
13.6%

Communication Services

DIVP
8.0%
OMAH
9.8%

Real Estate

DIVP
6.5%
OMAH

-

Utilities

DIVP
6.3%
OMAH

-

Consumer Cyclical

DIVP
4.4%
OMAH
4.1%

Basic Materials

DIVP
2.4%
OMAH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVP vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVP
DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVP vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVPOMAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.82

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

9.48

-4.00

DIVP vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVP and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVPOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.70

+0.12

Drawdowns

DIVP vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVP drawdown since its inception was -12.26%, roughly equal to the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVP and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVPOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-11.83%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-3.00%

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.65%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-1.26%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.21%

+1.36%

Volatility

DIVP vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that DIVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVPOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

1.93%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

5.49%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

8.05%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

13.21%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.78%

13.21%

-1.43%

DIVP vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVP vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

DIVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
5.69%6.06%5.92%
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF
15.44%12.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVP and OMAH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVP has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVP dropped -12.26% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

On 1-year performance, DIVP leads with 14.04% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, DIVP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVP has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 5.69% for DIVP.

They also come from different issuers: Cullen and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DIVP and 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVP and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer