DIVO vs. IWM
DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. DIVO is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVO returned 10.72%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for IWM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
DIVO vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 15.62% return.
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
DIVO vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.28% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 15.62% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVO and IWM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between DIVO and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVO vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVO
IWM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DIVO
IWM
Industrials
DIVO
IWM
Technology
DIVO
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
DIVO
IWM
Consumer Defensive
DIVO
IWM
Energy
DIVO
IWM
Healthcare
DIVO
IWM
Basic Materials
DIVO
IWM
Utilities
DIVO
IWM
Communication Services
DIVO
IWM
Real Estate
DIVO
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVO vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
DIVO
IWM
DIVO vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVO | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.24 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 11.44 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVO | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.83 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.24 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.36 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
DIVO vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVO | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | -59.05% | +29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.95% | -11.03% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | -27.50% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -31.91% | +18.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.71% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -10.76% | +8.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 3.11% | -1.46% |
Volatility
DIVO vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.30%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVO | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 6.52% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 14.00% | -6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.09% | 19.53% | -10.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 22.58% | -10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 23.07% | -8.23% |
DIVO vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVO vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than IWM's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.89% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVO and IWM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to DIVO (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.72% vs 5.48% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.89% for IWM.
DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.19% for IWM.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVO and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer