PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVN vs. APRJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVN vs. APRJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVN achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than APRJ's 3.91% return.


DIVN

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
6M
8.07%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.81%

APRJ

1D
0.12%
1M
0.40%
6M
3.74%
YTD
3.91%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.89K$66.20K$157.93K
$10.90M$5.41M$2.61M

DIVN vs. APRJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIVN and APRJ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVN vs. APRJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVN vs. APRJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVNAPRJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

2.03

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

16.24

-12.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.49

76.86

-65.37

DIVN vs. APRJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVN Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the APRJ Sharpe Ratio of 4.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVN and APRJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVN vs. APRJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVN drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, which is greater than APRJ's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVN and APRJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVNAPRJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-4.68%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-0.40%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-0.12%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.08%

+1.89%

Volatility

DIVN vs. APRJ - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) at 0.41%. This indicates that DIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVNAPRJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

0.41%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

1.29%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

1.57%

+8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.53%

3.57%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.53%

3.57%

+6.96%

DIVN vs. APRJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than APRJ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVN vs. APRJ - Dividend Comparison

DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than APRJ's 5.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
5.73%5.46%5.88%4.88%
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
3.70%1.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVN and APRJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVN has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to APRJ (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVN dropped -5.55% vs APRJ's -4.68%.

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.54% vs 6.48% for APRJ. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRJ.

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 3.70% for DIVN.

DIVN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while APRJ is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DIVN and 0.79% for APRJ.

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.14 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVN and APRJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer