DIVG vs. XMMO
DIVG (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DIVG returned 20.94% vs 36.97% for XMMO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
DIVG vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVG achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.
DIVG
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
DIVG vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF | 10.58% | 11.31% | 16.60% | 5.71% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVG and XMMO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DIVG and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIVG vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVG
XMMO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
DIVG
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
DIVG
XMMO
Utilities
DIVG
XMMO
Real Estate
DIVG
XMMO
Energy
DIVG
XMMO
Technology
DIVG
XMMO
Industrials
DIVG
XMMO
Basic Materials
DIVG
XMMO
Healthcare
DIVG
XMMO
Communication Services
DIVG
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
DIVG
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVG vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
DIVG
XMMO
DIVG vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 4.45 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 18.21 | -5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.99 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.58 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
DIVG vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVG drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVG and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -55.37% | +40.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | -8.34% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | 0.00% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -9.45% | +7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 2.04% | -0.44% |
Volatility
DIVG vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) is 2.53%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that DIVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 7.82% | -5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 15.54% | -8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.66% | 18.71% | -8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 21.45% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 22.27% | -9.08% |
DIVG vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVG vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
DIVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF | 3.10% | 3.15% | 4.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVG and XMMO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to DIVG (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVG dropped -14.95% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 1-year performance, XMMO leads with 36.97% vs 20.94% for DIVG. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DIVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 36.97% return vs 20.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DIVG.
DIVG has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
DIVG is categorized as S&P 500, while XMMO is Momentum. DIVG tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DIVG and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVG and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer