DIVE vs. NDIV
DIVE (Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF) and NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Dana, while NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. DIVE is actively managed, while NDIV is passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for NDIV.
Performance
DIVE vs. NDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than NDIV's 24.70% return.
DIVE
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NDIV
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- 24.70%
- 6M
- 25.76%
- 1Y
- 23.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVE vs. NDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIVE Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF | 0.47% | 1.94% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 24.70% | -4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVE and NDIV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVE vs. NDIV — Risk / Return Rank
DIVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NDIV
DIVE vs. NDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF (DIVE) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVE | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVE vs. NDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVE drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum NDIV drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVE and NDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVE | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -19.73% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -9.83% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -4.23% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.77% | — |
Volatility
DIVE vs. NDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVE | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 20.13% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 20.95% | -7.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 20.95% | -7.95% |
DIVE vs. NDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NDIV's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVE vs. NDIV - Dividend Comparison
DIVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than NDIV's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVE Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF | 0.98% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 6.94% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVE and NDIV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NDIV is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NDIV is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVE.
NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 0.98% for DIVE.
DIVE is categorized as Dividend, while NDIV is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dana and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVE and 0.59% for NDIV.
Find the right allocation for DIVE and NDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer