DIVD vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIVD (Altrius Global Dividend ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIVD returned 17.20%/yr vs 37.74%/yr for FWD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

DIVD vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVD achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 35.59% return.

DIVD

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 24.38%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -4.88%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 35.59%
• 6M: 33.13%
• 1Y: 66.65%
• 3Y*: 37.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVD vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF	11.73%	26.18%	2.52%	13.86%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	35.59%	32.00%	29.23%	23.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVD and FWD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023	0.47

The correlation between DIVD and FWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVD vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVD	FWD
Financial Services	19.1%	0.5%
Healthcare	19.0%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	18.2%	0.8%
Industrials	12.5%	19.3%
Energy	8.6%	2.6%
Technology	8.0%	59.8%
Basic Materials	5.4%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	3.6%
Communication Services	3.5%	3.4%
Real Estate	1.2%	0.7%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

DIVD vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVD

DIVD Risk / Return Rank: 73
DIVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DIVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DIVD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DIVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DIVD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 81
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVD vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVD	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.51	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.02	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.41	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	5.14	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.36	17.45	-4.09

DIVD vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVD Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVD and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVD vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVD drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVD and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVD	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.88%	-29.02%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-13.03%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.88%	-29.02%	+15.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-4.88%	+3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-4.06%	+1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	3.83%	-2.00%

Volatility

DIVD vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) is 2.77%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that DIVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVD	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	12.86%	-10.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	21.86%	-13.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	26.73%	-15.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.24%	25.39%	-12.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.24%	25.39%	-12.15%

DIVD vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVD vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

DIVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF	2.71%	2.86%	3.39%	2.96%	0.60%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVD and FWD in my portfolio?

DIVD and FWD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVD or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to DIVD (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVD dropped -13.88% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, DIVD or FWD?

On 3-year performance, FWD leads with 37.74% vs 17.20% for DIVD. On fees, DIVD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DIVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVD or FWD?

Over the 3-year period, FWD has performed better with a 37.74% return vs 17.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVD or FWD?

DIVD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVD or FWD?

DIVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between DIVD and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Altrius and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DIVD and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.