PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 4.30%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


DIV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.97%
YTD
14.48%
6M
13.33%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
4.30%

XLK

1D
0.87%
1M
2.95%
YTD
28.52%
6M
28.96%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
14.48%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.52%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and XLK is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and XLK has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DIV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIV
XLK

Energy

23.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

20.2%

-

Utilities

12.1%

-

Industrials

11.7%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%

-

Communication Services

6.1%

-

Basic Materials

4.5%

-

Financial Services

3.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Technology

-

99.7%

Energy

DIV
23.5%
XLK
0.2%

Real Estate

DIV
20.2%
XLK

-

Utilities

DIV
12.1%
XLK

-

Industrials

DIV
11.7%
XLK
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

DIV
10.7%
XLK

-

Communication Services

DIV
6.1%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

DIV
4.5%
XLK

-

Financial Services

DIV
3.8%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

DIV
3.7%
XLK

-

Healthcare

DIV
3.5%
XLK

-

Technology

DIV

-

XLK
99.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.36

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

10.85

-2.42

DIV vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-82.05%

+29.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.23%

-15.92%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-25.66%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-33.56%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

-33.56%

-19.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-6.77%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-34.93%

+27.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

4.92%

-3.04%

Volatility

DIV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.07%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

10.86%

-7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

18.92%

-11.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

22.55%

-12.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

25.18%

-11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

24.64%

-6.66%

DIV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.61%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and XLK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.

DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer