DIV vs. XLK
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.30%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for XLK. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
DIV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 4.30%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
DIV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and XLK is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and XLK has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DIV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
XLK
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
XLK
Real Estate
DIV
XLK
-
Utilities
DIV
XLK
-
Industrials
DIV
XLK
Consumer Defensive
DIV
XLK
-
Communication Services
DIV
XLK
-
Basic Materials
DIV
XLK
-
Financial Services
DIV
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
XLK
-
Healthcare
DIV
XLK
-
Technology
DIV
-
XLK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
XLK
DIV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.36 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 10.85 | -2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -82.05% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -15.92% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -25.66% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -33.56% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -33.56% | -19.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -6.77% | +6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -34.93% | +27.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 4.92% | -3.04% |
Volatility
DIV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.07%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 10.86% | -7.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 18.92% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 22.55% | -12.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 25.18% | -11.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 24.64% | -6.66% |
DIV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and XLK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer