DIV vs. FLSP
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. DIV is passively managed, while FLSP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIV returned 5.62%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for FLSP. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLSP.
Performance
DIV vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than FLSP's 1.97% return.
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
FLSP
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 14.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
DIV vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | -0.01% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 1.97% | 15.56% | 11.75% | 3.14% | 0.44% | 11.44% | -15.19% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and FLSP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019 | 0.08 |
The correlation between DIV and FLSP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
FLSP
DIV vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.63 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 10.82 | -2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, which is greater than FLSP's maximum drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and FLSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -22.75% | -29.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -4.03% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -6.69% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -9.52% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.26% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -6.26% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.39% | +0.53% |
Volatility
DIV vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) at 1.79%. This indicates that DIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 1.79% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 6.78% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 9.07% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 13.35% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 13.48% | +4.52% |
DIV vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than FLSP's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.60% | 2.65% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 2.18% | 1.19% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and FLSP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to FLSP (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs FLSP's -22.75%.
On 5-year performance, FLSP leads with 8.35% vs 5.62% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 8.35% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FLSP.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 2.60% for FLSP.
DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.65% for FLSP.
FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and FLSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer