DIV vs. EPMV
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. DIV is passively managed, while EPMV is actively managed. Over the past year, DIV returned 15.53% vs 27.69% for EPMV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPMV.
Performance
DIV vs. EPMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly lower than EPMV's 18.03% return.
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
EPMV
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIV vs. EPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 2.06% |
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF | 18.03% | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and EPMV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DIV and EPMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIV vs. EPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
EPMV
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
EPMV
Real Estate
DIV
EPMV
Industrials
DIV
EPMV
Utilities
DIV
EPMV
Consumer Defensive
DIV
EPMV
Communication Services
DIV
EPMV
-
Basic Materials
DIV
EPMV
Financial Services
DIV
EPMV
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
EPMV
Healthcare
DIV
EPMV
Technology
DIV
-
EPMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. EPMV — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
EPMV
DIV vs. EPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.17 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 10.38 | -2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. EPMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, which is greater than EPMV's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and EPMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -8.78% | -43.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -8.78% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.40% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -1.74% | -5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.67% | -0.75% |
Volatility
DIV vs. EPMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.68%, while Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | EPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 4.91% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 11.71% | -4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 15.53% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 15.59% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 15.59% | +2.41% |
DIV vs. EPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EPMV's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. EPMV - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than EPMV's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.25% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and EPMV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPMV has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs EPMV's -8.78%.
On 1-year performance, EPMV leads with 27.69% vs 15.53% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPMV has performed better with a 27.69% return vs 15.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.88% for EPMV.
EPMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and EPMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer