PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISV vs. FGSKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISV vs. FGSKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than FGSKX's 1.77% return.


DISV

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.34%
YTD
10.83%
6M
15.28%
1Y
34.34%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
10Y*

FGSKX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.77%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.76%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISV vs. FGSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
10.83%47.42%5.87%19.52%-9.72%
FGSKX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
1.77%10.90%33.36%27.45%-15.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DISV and FGSKX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between DISV and FGSKX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISV vs. FGSKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISV
DISV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FGSKX
FGSKX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FGSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISV vs. FGSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISVFGSKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

0.34

+2.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

0.61

+2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.08

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

0.41

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.27

1.12

+9.14

DISV vs. FGSKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the FGSKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISV and FGSKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISVFGSKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.34

+2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.44

+0.49

Drawdowns

DISV vs. FGSKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum FGSKX drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and FGSKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISVFGSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-55.05%

+28.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.69%

-14.01%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-24.47%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-3.32%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-10.86%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

5.08%

-1.73%

Volatility

DISV vs. FGSKX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) at 3.52%. This indicates that DISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISVFGSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.52%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

13.96%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

17.02%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

22.42%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

22.38%

-5.02%

DISV vs. FGSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSKX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISV vs. FGSKX - Dividend Comparison

DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than FGSKX's 5.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
2.39%2.69%2.77%2.73%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGSKX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
5.27%5.37%4.70%0.00%2.52%28.15%7.60%8.72%15.47%14.82%0.89%26.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISV and FGSKX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DISV has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to FGSKX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs FGSKX's -55.05%.

DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISV and FGSKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer