DISV vs. DFAX
DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) and DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. DISV is actively managed, while DFAX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DISV returned 24.35%/yr vs 20.90%/yr for DFAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DISV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DFAX.
Performance
DISV vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.23% return.
DISV
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 34.34%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DISV vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 10.83% | 47.42% | 5.87% | 19.52% | -9.72% |
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.23% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISV and DFAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DISV and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DISV vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DISV
DFAX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
DISV
DFAX
Basic Materials
DISV
DFAX
Industrials
DISV
DFAX
Consumer Cyclical
DISV
DFAX
Energy
DISV
DFAX
Consumer Defensive
DISV
DFAX
Technology
DISV
DFAX
Communication Services
DISV
DFAX
Real Estate
DISV
DFAX
Healthcare
DISV
DFAX
Utilities
DISV
DFAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISV vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank
DISV
DFAX
DISV vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DISV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.37 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 3.17 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.16 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 12.50 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DISV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.37 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
DISV vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAX drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and DFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -28.15% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -11.11% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.15% | -13.89% | -0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -1.00% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -6.67% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.80% | +0.55% |
Volatility
DISV vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) is 4.16%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that DISV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 5.27% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 12.67% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 14.83% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 15.99% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 15.99% | +1.37% |
DISV vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISV vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison
DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than DFAX's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% |
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.39% | 2.69% | 2.77% | 2.73% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DISV and DFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DISV (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs DFAX's -28.15%.
On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 24.35% vs 20.90% for DFAX. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 24.35% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.
DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.
DISV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DFAX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.30% for DFAX.
DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DISV and DFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer