PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISSX vs. SWSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISSX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than SWSSX's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DISSX has underperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


DISSX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.55%
YTD
16.16%
6M
14.84%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
10.07%

SWSSX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.00%
YTD
18.71%
6M
17.43%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
16.16%5.41%6.87%14.24%-16.71%26.41%10.92%22.28%-8.30%12.40%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
18.71%12.88%11.57%17.07%-20.43%14.77%20.12%25.63%-11.19%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DISSX and SWSSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.98

The correlation between DISSX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISSX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISSX
DISSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSSX
SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISSXSWSSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

2.28

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

3.13

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.97

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.11

14.11

-0.99

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the SWSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISSX and SWSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISSXSWSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.28

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.30

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.47

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.36

+0.04

Drawdowns

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISSX drawdown since its inception was -58.30%, roughly equal to the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISSX and SWSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISSXSWSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.30%

-60.34%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-11.00%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-27.50%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-31.93%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-41.81%

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.13%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-10.73%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.09%

-0.47%

Volatility

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) is 4.49%, while Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that DISSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISSXSWSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

5.61%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

13.60%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

19.15%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

22.59%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

24.09%

-0.92%

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISSX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison

DISSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.28%, more than SWSSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
13.28%15.42%14.79%8.20%13.87%10.72%7.61%8.35%13.18%7.40%6.49%11.30%
SWSSX
Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares
1.08%1.29%1.66%1.49%1.32%8.88%2.55%6.12%10.45%5.22%4.10%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DISSX and SWSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWSSX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to DISSX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISSX dropped -58.30% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.

SWSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISSX and SWSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer